Review




Structured Review

ANSYS inc 3d mesh model
3d Mesh Model, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d mesh model/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d mesh model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

86
Abaqus Inc hyper mesh 32 3d fiber metal laminates fmls continuum damage model low velocity impact tests
Hyper Mesh 32 3d Fiber Metal Laminates Fmls Continuum Damage Model Low Velocity Impact Tests, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hyper mesh 32 3d fiber metal laminates fmls continuum damage model low velocity impact tests/product/Abaqus Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hyper mesh 32 3d fiber metal laminates fmls continuum damage model low velocity impact tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Geomagic Inc 3d mesh model
3d Mesh Model, supplied by Geomagic Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d mesh model/product/Geomagic Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d mesh model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3d mesh model
3d Mesh Model, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d mesh model/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d mesh model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3d model meshing
3d Model Meshing, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d model meshing/product/ANSYS inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d model meshing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d geometric model meshed using comsol 6.1
3d Geometric Model Meshed Using Comsol 6.1, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d geometric model meshed using comsol 6.1/product/COMSOL Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d geometric model meshed using comsol 6.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Autodesk Inc 3d mesh modeling software meshmixer v3.5
3d Mesh Modeling Software Meshmixer V3.5, supplied by Autodesk Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d mesh modeling software meshmixer v3.5/product/Autodesk Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d mesh modeling software meshmixer v3.5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Geomagic Inc 3d surface mesh models
Bone Surface D istance Repeatability Analysis Pipeline. (A) To assess bone surface repeatability, two DESS MRI scans from a single participant are inputted into the trained tibia and femur segmentation models. (B) The trained models predict the tibia and femur masks. (C) The outer contours from the predicted masks are extracted and reconstructed into <t>3D</t> models <t>using</t> <t>Geomagic</t> Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). (D) The tibia and femur models from Scan 1 and Scan 2 are aligned using an iterative closest point technique . (E) Bone surface distances in the x-, y-, and z-directions are calculated between the two scans across all regions of interest . M ​= ​medial and L ​= ​lateral.
3d Surface Mesh Models, supplied by Geomagic Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d surface mesh models/product/Geomagic Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d surface mesh models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Abaqus Inc 3d model meshing
Bone Surface D istance Repeatability Analysis Pipeline. (A) To assess bone surface repeatability, two DESS MRI scans from a single participant are inputted into the trained tibia and femur segmentation models. (B) The trained models predict the tibia and femur masks. (C) The outer contours from the predicted masks are extracted and reconstructed into <t>3D</t> models <t>using</t> <t>Geomagic</t> Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). (D) The tibia and femur models from Scan 1 and Scan 2 are aligned using an iterative closest point technique . (E) Bone surface distances in the x-, y-, and z-directions are calculated between the two scans across all regions of interest . M ​= ​medial and L ​= ​lateral.
3d Model Meshing, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/3d model meshing/product/Abaqus Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d model meshing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Bone Surface D istance Repeatability Analysis Pipeline. (A) To assess bone surface repeatability, two DESS MRI scans from a single participant are inputted into the trained tibia and femur segmentation models. (B) The trained models predict the tibia and femur masks. (C) The outer contours from the predicted masks are extracted and reconstructed into 3D models using Geomagic Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). (D) The tibia and femur models from Scan 1 and Scan 2 are aligned using an iterative closest point technique . (E) Bone surface distances in the x-, y-, and z-directions are calculated between the two scans across all regions of interest . M ​= ​medial and L ​= ​lateral.

Journal: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open

Article Title: Tibiofemoral cartilage strain and recovery following a 3-mile run measured using deep learning segmentation of bone and cartilage

doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100556

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bone Surface D istance Repeatability Analysis Pipeline. (A) To assess bone surface repeatability, two DESS MRI scans from a single participant are inputted into the trained tibia and femur segmentation models. (B) The trained models predict the tibia and femur masks. (C) The outer contours from the predicted masks are extracted and reconstructed into 3D models using Geomagic Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). (D) The tibia and femur models from Scan 1 and Scan 2 are aligned using an iterative closest point technique . (E) Bone surface distances in the x-, y-, and z-directions are calculated between the two scans across all regions of interest . M ​= ​medial and L ​= ​lateral.

Article Snippet: Bone and Cartilage 3D Model Reconstruction Pipeline. (A) Each DESS MRI scan is inputted into the 4 trained segmentation models, and binary masks are outputted for each of the 4 tissues. (B) Visualization of the predicted bone and cartilage masks overlaid on the original DESS MRI scan. (C) Mask contours are extracted, converted into point clouds, and reconstructed into 3D surface mesh models using Geomagic Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina).

Techniques:

Bone and Cartilage 3D Model Reconstruction Pipeline. (A) Each DESS MRI scan is inputted into the 4 trained segmentation models, and binary masks are outputted for each of the 4 tissues. (B) Visualization of the predicted bone and cartilage masks overlaid on the original DESS MRI scan. (C) Mask contours are extracted, converted into point clouds, and reconstructed into 3D surface mesh models using Geomagic Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). Tan color indicates the tibia and femur, while green indicates the tibial and femoral cartilage.

Journal: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open

Article Title: Tibiofemoral cartilage strain and recovery following a 3-mile run measured using deep learning segmentation of bone and cartilage

doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100556

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bone and Cartilage 3D Model Reconstruction Pipeline. (A) Each DESS MRI scan is inputted into the 4 trained segmentation models, and binary masks are outputted for each of the 4 tissues. (B) Visualization of the predicted bone and cartilage masks overlaid on the original DESS MRI scan. (C) Mask contours are extracted, converted into point clouds, and reconstructed into 3D surface mesh models using Geomagic Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). Tan color indicates the tibia and femur, while green indicates the tibial and femoral cartilage.

Article Snippet: Bone and Cartilage 3D Model Reconstruction Pipeline. (A) Each DESS MRI scan is inputted into the 4 trained segmentation models, and binary masks are outputted for each of the 4 tissues. (B) Visualization of the predicted bone and cartilage masks overlaid on the original DESS MRI scan. (C) Mask contours are extracted, converted into point clouds, and reconstructed into 3D surface mesh models using Geomagic Studio 11 (3D Systems; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina).

Techniques: